Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Electricity generation from nuclear
Colombia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Colombia rank
33rd
Zimbabwe rank
33rd
Electricity generation from nuclear over time
- Colombia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 208 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from nuclear, Colombia or Zimbabwe?
- Colombia, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from nuclear between Colombia and Zimbabwe?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Zimbabwe?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2025.
- How do Colombia and Zimbabwe rank globally for electricity generation from nuclear?
- Colombia ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours.