What is the difference in oil production, per unit of gdp between Congo, Republic of and Iraq?

0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP, with Congo, Republic of ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Republic of and Iraq?

66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Oil production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo, Republic of vs Iraq: Oil production, per unit of GDP

Congo, Republic of

0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Iraq

0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Congo, Republic of rank

3rd

Iraq rank

5th

Oil production, per unit of GDP over time

Congo, Republic of
Iraq

How they compare

Congo, Republic of currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP against 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP in Iraq, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Iraq ahead.

Congo, Republic of ranks 3rd and Iraq ranks 5th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo, Republic of averaged higher in 4 and Iraq in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo, Republic of	Iraq	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	Iraq
1970s	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	Iraq
1980s	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	Congo, Republic of
1990s	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	Iraq
2000s	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	Congo, Republic of
2010s	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	Congo, Republic of
2020s	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	Congo, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oil production, per unit of gdp, Congo, Republic of or Iraq?: Congo, Republic of, at 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP against 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP in Iraq as of 2025.
What is the difference in oil production, per unit of gdp between Congo, Republic of and Iraq?: 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP, with Congo, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Republic of and Iraq?: 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Congo, Republic of and Iraq rank globally for oil production, per unit of gdp?: Congo, Republic of ranks 3rd and Iraq ranks 5th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Oil production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Republic of vs Iraq: Oil production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 October 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/oil-production-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/iraq/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/oil-production-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/iraq/">Congo, Republic of vs Iraq: Oil production, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Oil production, per unit of GDP
Unit: terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 201 places, 9,680 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 29 August 2026

Oil production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.