American Samoa vs Malta: Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables
American Samoa
3,633
in 2024
Malta
3,374
in 2025
American Samoa rank
41st
Malta rank
44th
Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables over time
- American Samoa
- Malta
How they compare
American Samoa currently reports 3,633 against 3,374 in Malta, a difference of 259.
That makes American Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malta ahead.
American Samoa ranks 41st and Malta ranks 44th of 204 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | American Samoa | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,255 | 5,261 | 2,006 | Malta |
| 2010s | 3,003 | 4,038 | 1,035 | Malta |
| 2020s | 3,518 | 3,682 | 163.65 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables, American Samoa or Malta?
- American Samoa, at 3,633 against 3,374 in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables between American Samoa and Malta?
- 259, with American Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Malta?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do American Samoa and Malta rank globally for per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables?
- American Samoa ranks 41st and Malta ranks 44th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.