Aruba vs New Caledonia: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables

Aruba
7,680 kilowatt-hours
in 2024
New Caledonia
7,791 kilowatt-hours
in 2024
Aruba rank
16th
New Caledonia rank
14th

Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables over time

  • Aruba
  • New Caledonia
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k200020122024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 7,791 kilowatt-hours against 7,680 kilowatt-hours in Aruba, a difference of 111 kilowatt-hours.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 16th and New Caledonia ranks 14th of 208 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba New Caledonia Difference Ahead
2000s 9,268 kilowatt-hours 5,879 kilowatt-hours 3,388 kilowatt-hours Aruba
2010s 7,764 kilowatt-hours 8,691 kilowatt-hours 927.42 kilowatt-hours New Caledonia
2020s 7,684 kilowatt-hours 8,225 kilowatt-hours 541.46 kilowatt-hours New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables, Aruba or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 7,791 kilowatt-hours against 7,680 kilowatt-hours in Aruba as of 2024.
What is the difference in per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables between Aruba and New Caledonia?
111 kilowatt-hours, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and New Caledonia?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Aruba and New Caledonia rank globally for per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables?
Aruba ranks 16th and New Caledonia ranks 14th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs New Caledonia: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid, drawing on Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-electricity-fossil-nuclear-renewables/aruba/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-electricity-fossil-nuclear-renewables/aruba/new-caledonia/">Aruba vs New Caledonia: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables
Unit
kilowatt-hours
Source
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,940 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in kilowatt-hours per person.