Belarus vs South Africa: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables

Belarus
3,019 kilowatt-hours
in 2025
South Africa
3,080 kilowatt-hours
in 2025
Belarus rank
52nd
South Africa rank
50th

Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables over time

  • Belarus
  • South Africa
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k198520052025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 3,080 kilowatt-hours against 3,019 kilowatt-hours in Belarus, a difference of 61 kilowatt-hours.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was South Africa ahead.

Belarus ranks 52nd and South Africa ranks 50th of 208 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus South Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 3,040 kilowatt-hours 4,555 kilowatt-hours 1,515 kilowatt-hours South Africa
2010s 3,602 kilowatt-hours 4,231 kilowatt-hours 629.38 kilowatt-hours South Africa
2020s 3,396 kilowatt-hours 3,296 kilowatt-hours 100.04 kilowatt-hours Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables, Belarus or South Africa?
South Africa, at 3,080 kilowatt-hours against 3,019 kilowatt-hours in Belarus as of 2025.
What is the difference in per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables between Belarus and South Africa?
61 kilowatt-hours, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Belarus and South Africa rank globally for per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables?
Belarus ranks 52nd and South Africa ranks 50th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs South Africa: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid, drawing on Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-electricity-fossil-nuclear-renewables/belarus/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-electricity-fossil-nuclear-renewables/belarus/south-africa/">Belarus vs South Africa: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables
Unit
kilowatt-hours
Source
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,940 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in kilowatt-hours per person.