Belgium vs French Polynesia: Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables
Belgium
1,735
in 2025
French Polynesia
1,668
in 2024
Belgium rank
76th
French Polynesia rank
79th
Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Belgium
- French Polynesia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 1,735 against 1,668 in French Polynesia, a difference of 67.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 76th and French Polynesia ranks 79th of 204 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,242 | 1,301 | 1,941 | Belgium |
| 2010s | 2,624 | 1,782 | 842.01 | Belgium |
| 2020s | 2,107 | 1,669 | 437.92 | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables, Belgium or French Polynesia?
- Belgium, at 1,735 against 1,668 in French Polynesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables between Belgium and French Polynesia?
- 67, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and French Polynesia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and French Polynesia rank globally for per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables?
- Belgium ranks 76th and French Polynesia ranks 79th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.