Botswana vs Maldives: Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables
Botswana
1,357
in 2024
Maldives
1,497
in 2024
Botswana rank
92nd
Maldives rank
89th
Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Botswana
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 1,497 against 1,357 in Botswana, a difference of 140.
That makes Maldives's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 92nd and Maldives ranks 89th of 204 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 533.01 | 856.63 | 323.62 | Maldives |
| 2010s | 845.57 | 1,302 | 456.47 | Maldives |
| 2020s | 1,130 | 1,518 | 388.01 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables, Botswana or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 1,497 against 1,357 in Botswana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables between Botswana and Maldives?
- 140, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Maldives?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Maldives rank globally for per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables?
- Botswana ranks 92nd and Maldives ranks 89th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.