Botswana vs Suriname: Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables
Botswana
1,357
in 2024
Suriname
1,292
in 2024
Botswana rank
92nd
Suriname rank
94th
Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Botswana
- Suriname
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 1,357 against 1,292 in Suriname, a difference of 65.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 92nd and Suriname ranks 94th of 204 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 533.01 | 1,121 | 588.33 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 845.57 | 1,644 | 798.44 | Suriname |
| 2020s | 1,130 | 1,587 | 457.42 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables, Botswana or Suriname?
- Botswana, at 1,357 against 1,292 in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables between Botswana and Suriname?
- 65, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Suriname?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Suriname rank globally for per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables?
- Botswana ranks 92nd and Suriname ranks 94th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.