Brazil vs Samoa: Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables
Brazil
397.96
in 2025
Samoa
412.79
in 2024
Brazil rank
132nd
Samoa rank
130th
Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Brazil
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 412.79 against 397.96 in Brazil, a difference of 14.83.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Samoa ahead.
Brazil ranks 132nd and Samoa ranks 130th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 217.47 | 315.38 | 97.91 | Samoa |
| 2010s | 490.51 | 446.65 | 43.86 | Brazil |
| 2020s | 415.36 | 437.24 | 21.87 | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables, Brazil or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 412.79 against 397.96 in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables between Brazil and Samoa?
- 14.83, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Samoa?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Samoa rank globally for per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables?
- Brazil ranks 132nd and Samoa ranks 130th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.