Colombia vs Samoa: Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables
Colombia
388.58
in 2025
Samoa
412.79
in 2024
Colombia rank
133rd
Samoa rank
130th
Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Colombia
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 412.79 against 388.58 in Colombia, a difference of 24.21.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 133rd and Samoa ranks 130th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 254.55 | 315.38 | 60.83 | Samoa |
| 2010s | 426.9 | 446.65 | 19.75 | Samoa |
| 2020s | 510.38 | 437.24 | 73.14 | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables, Colombia or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 412.79 against 388.58 in Colombia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables between Colombia and Samoa?
- 24.21, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Samoa?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Colombia and Samoa rank globally for per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables?
- Colombia ranks 133rd and Samoa ranks 130th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.