Congo vs Peru: Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables
Congo
682.14
in 2024
Peru
635.4
in 2025
Congo rank
117th
Peru rank
119th
Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Congo
- Peru
How they compare
Congo currently reports 682.14 against 635.4 in Peru, a difference of 46.74.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 117th and Peru ranks 119th of 204 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.81 | 253.04 | 236.23 | Peru |
| 2010s | 251.79 | 673.36 | 421.58 | Peru |
| 2020s | 602.01 | 712.46 | 110.45 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables, Congo or Peru?
- Congo, at 682.14 against 635.4 in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables between Congo and Peru?
- 46.74, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Peru?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Peru rank globally for per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables?
- Congo ranks 117th and Peru ranks 119th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.