Ecuador vs Samoa: Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables
Ecuador
412.25
in 2025
Samoa
412.79
in 2024
Ecuador rank
131st
Samoa rank
130th
Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Ecuador
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 412.79 against 412.25 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.54.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 131st and Samoa ranks 130th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Samoa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 420.68 | 315.38 | 105.31 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 634.39 | 446.65 | 187.74 | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 434.28 | 437.24 | 2.96 | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables, Ecuador or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 412.79 against 412.25 in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables between Ecuador and Samoa?
- 0.54, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Samoa?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Samoa rank globally for per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables?
- Ecuador ranks 131st and Samoa ranks 130th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.