Equatorial Guinea vs Finland: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables

Equatorial Guinea
575.95 kilowatt-hours
in 2024
Finland
535.27 kilowatt-hours
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
124th
Finland rank
126th

Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Finland
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199020072025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 575.95 kilowatt-hours against 535.27 kilowatt-hours in Finland, a difference of 40.68 kilowatt-hours.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 124th and Finland ranks 126th of 208 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Finland Difference Ahead
2000s 95.82 kilowatt-hours 6,000 kilowatt-hours 5,905 kilowatt-hours Finland
2010s 458.1 kilowatt-hours 3,502 kilowatt-hours 3,044 kilowatt-hours Finland
2020s 562.68 kilowatt-hours 1,341 kilowatt-hours 778.02 kilowatt-hours Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables, Equatorial Guinea or Finland?
Equatorial Guinea, at 575.95 kilowatt-hours against 535.27 kilowatt-hours in Finland as of 2024.
What is the difference in per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables between Equatorial Guinea and Finland?
40.68 kilowatt-hours, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Finland?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Finland rank globally for per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 124th and Finland ranks 126th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Finland: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid, drawing on Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-electricity-fossil-nuclear-renewables/equatorial-guinea/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-electricity-fossil-nuclear-renewables/equatorial-guinea/finland/">Equatorial Guinea vs Finland: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables
Unit
kilowatt-hours
Source
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,940 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in kilowatt-hours per person.