Faroe Islands vs Hong Kong, China: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables

Faroe Islands
4,750 kilowatt-hours
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
4,997 kilowatt-hours
in 2024
Faroe Islands rank
30th
Hong Kong, China rank
29th

Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Hong Kong, China
02.0k4.0k6.0k200020122024

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 4,997 kilowatt-hours against 4,750 kilowatt-hours in Faroe Islands, a difference of 247 kilowatt-hours.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Faroe Islands's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 30th and Hong Kong, China ranks 29th of 208 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong, China in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2000s 3,189 kilowatt-hours 5,256 kilowatt-hours 2,068 kilowatt-hours Hong Kong, China
2010s 3,528 kilowatt-hours 5,195 kilowatt-hours 1,666 kilowatt-hours Hong Kong, China
2020s 4,797 kilowatt-hours 4,795 kilowatt-hours 2.16 kilowatt-hours Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables, Faroe Islands or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 4,997 kilowatt-hours against 4,750 kilowatt-hours in Faroe Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables between Faroe Islands and Hong Kong, China?
247 kilowatt-hours, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Hong Kong, China?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Faroe Islands and Hong Kong, China rank globally for per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables?
Faroe Islands ranks 30th and Hong Kong, China ranks 29th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Hong Kong, China: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid, drawing on Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-electricity-fossil-nuclear-renewables/faroe-islands/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-electricity-fossil-nuclear-renewables/faroe-islands/hong-kong-sar-china/">Faroe Islands vs Hong Kong, China: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables
Unit
kilowatt-hours
Source
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,940 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in kilowatt-hours per person.