Georgia vs Macau, China: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables

Georgia
722.42 kilowatt-hours
in 2025
Macau, China
749.72 kilowatt-hours
in 2024
Georgia rank
116th
Macau, China rank
115th

Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables over time

  • Georgia
  • Macau, China
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k200020122025

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 749.72 kilowatt-hours against 722.42 kilowatt-hours in Georgia, a difference of 27.3 kilowatt-hours.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Macau, China ahead.

Georgia ranks 116th and Macau, China ranks 115th of 208 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Macau, China in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Macau, China Difference Ahead
2000s 301.03 kilowatt-hours 3,141 kilowatt-hours 2,840 kilowatt-hours Macau, China
2010s 550.73 kilowatt-hours 1,025 kilowatt-hours 474.3 kilowatt-hours Macau, China
2020s 781.72 kilowatt-hours 547.41 kilowatt-hours 234.31 kilowatt-hours Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables, Georgia or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 749.72 kilowatt-hours against 722.42 kilowatt-hours in Georgia as of 2024.
What is the difference in per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables between Georgia and Macau, China?
27.3 kilowatt-hours, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Macau, China?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Georgia and Macau, China rank globally for per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables?
Georgia ranks 116th and Macau, China ranks 115th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Macau, China: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid, drawing on Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-electricity-fossil-nuclear-renewables/georgia/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-electricity-fossil-nuclear-renewables/georgia/macao-sar-china/">Georgia vs Macau, China: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables
Unit
kilowatt-hours
Source
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,940 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in kilowatt-hours per person.