Grenada vs Mauritius: Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables
Grenada
2,047
in 2024
Mauritius
2,203
in 2024
Grenada rank
65th
Mauritius rank
62nd
Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Grenada
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 2,203 against 2,047 in Grenada, a difference of 156.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 65th and Mauritius ranks 62nd of 204 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,469 | 1,315 | 153.8 | Grenada |
| 2010s | 1,874 | 1,804 | 70.16 | Grenada |
| 2020s | 2,002 | 1,968 | 34.19 | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables, Grenada or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 2,203 against 2,047 in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables between Grenada and Mauritius?
- 156, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Mauritius?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Mauritius rank globally for per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables?
- Grenada ranks 65th and Mauritius ranks 62nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.