Kiribati vs Mali: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables

Kiribati
223.01 kilowatt-hours
in 2024
Mali
196.09 kilowatt-hours
in 2024
Kiribati rank
153rd
Mali rank
155th

Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables over time

  • Kiribati
  • Mali
50100150200250300200020122024

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 223.01 kilowatt-hours against 196.09 kilowatt-hours in Mali, a difference of 26.92 kilowatt-hours.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 153rd and Mali ranks 155th of 208 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Mali Difference Ahead
2000s 214.89 kilowatt-hours 69.41 kilowatt-hours 145.48 kilowatt-hours Kiribati
2010s 231.36 kilowatt-hours 76.39 kilowatt-hours 154.97 kilowatt-hours Kiribati
2020s 230.17 kilowatt-hours 144.17 kilowatt-hours 85.99 kilowatt-hours Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables, Kiribati or Mali?
Kiribati, at 223.01 kilowatt-hours against 196.09 kilowatt-hours in Mali as of 2024.
What is the difference in per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables between Kiribati and Mali?
26.92 kilowatt-hours, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Mali?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Mali rank globally for per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables?
Kiribati ranks 153rd and Mali ranks 155th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Mali: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid, drawing on Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-electricity-fossil-nuclear-renewables/kiribati/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-electricity-fossil-nuclear-renewables/kiribati/mali/">Kiribati vs Mali: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables
Unit
kilowatt-hours
Source
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,940 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in kilowatt-hours per person.