Kiribati vs Nicaragua: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables

Kiribati
223.01 kilowatt-hours
in 2024
Nicaragua
245.8 kilowatt-hours
in 2024
Kiribati rank
153rd
Nicaragua rank
150th

Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables over time

  • Kiribati
  • Nicaragua
100200300400200020122024

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 245.8 kilowatt-hours against 223.01 kilowatt-hours in Kiribati, a difference of 22.79 kilowatt-hours.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Kiribati ranks 153rd and Nicaragua ranks 150th of 208 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Nicaragua Difference Ahead
2000s 214.89 kilowatt-hours 385.06 kilowatt-hours 170.17 kilowatt-hours Nicaragua
2010s 231.36 kilowatt-hours 354.19 kilowatt-hours 122.83 kilowatt-hours Nicaragua
2020s 230.17 kilowatt-hours 218.9 kilowatt-hours 11.26 kilowatt-hours Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables, Kiribati or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 245.8 kilowatt-hours against 223.01 kilowatt-hours in Kiribati as of 2024.
What is the difference in per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables between Kiribati and Nicaragua?
22.79 kilowatt-hours, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Nicaragua?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Nicaragua rank globally for per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables?
Kiribati ranks 153rd and Nicaragua ranks 150th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Nicaragua: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid, drawing on Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-electricity-fossil-nuclear-renewables/kiribati/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-electricity-fossil-nuclear-renewables/kiribati/nicaragua/">Kiribati vs Nicaragua: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables
Unit
kilowatt-hours
Source
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,940 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in kilowatt-hours per person.