Kiribati vs Western Sahara: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables
Kiribati
223.01 kilowatt-hours
in 2024
Western Sahara
227.87 kilowatt-hours
in 2009
Kiribati rank
153rd
Western Sahara rank
152nd
Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables over time
- Kiribati
- Western Sahara
How they compare
Western Sahara currently reports 227.87 kilowatt-hours against 223.01 kilowatt-hours in Kiribati, a difference of 4.86 kilowatt-hours.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Western Sahara ahead.
Kiribati ranks 153rd and Western Sahara ranks 152nd of 208 countries.
Western Sahara has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables, Kiribati or Western Sahara?
- Western Sahara, at 227.87 kilowatt-hours against 223.01 kilowatt-hours in Kiribati as of 2009.
- What is the difference in per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables between Kiribati and Western Sahara?
- 4.86 kilowatt-hours, with Western Sahara ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Western Sahara?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2009.
- How do Kiribati and Western Sahara rank globally for per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables?
- Kiribati ranks 153rd and Western Sahara ranks 152nd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in kilowatt-hours per person.