Kyrgyzstan vs Norway: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables

Kyrgyzstan
330.36 kilowatt-hours
in 2025
Norway
286.32 kilowatt-hours
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
143rd
Norway rank
145th

Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Norway
02505007501.0k199020072025

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 330.36 kilowatt-hours against 286.32 kilowatt-hours in Norway, a difference of 44.04 kilowatt-hours.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 143rd and Norway ranks 145th of 208 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Norway Difference Ahead
2000s 391.76 kilowatt-hours 232.2 kilowatt-hours 159.56 kilowatt-hours Kyrgyzstan
2010s 212.32 kilowatt-hours 619.84 kilowatt-hours 407.52 kilowatt-hours Norway
2020s 274.26 kilowatt-hours 348.23 kilowatt-hours 73.98 kilowatt-hours Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables, Kyrgyzstan or Norway?
Kyrgyzstan, at 330.36 kilowatt-hours against 286.32 kilowatt-hours in Norway as of 2025.
What is the difference in per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables between Kyrgyzstan and Norway?
44.04 kilowatt-hours, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Norway?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Norway rank globally for per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 143rd and Norway ranks 145th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Norway: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid, drawing on Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-electricity-fossil-nuclear-renewables/kyrgyz-republic/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-electricity-fossil-nuclear-renewables/kyrgyz-republic/norway/">Kyrgyzstan vs Norway: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables
Unit
kilowatt-hours
Source
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,940 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in kilowatt-hours per person.