Mali vs Western Sahara: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables
Mali
196.09 kilowatt-hours
in 2024
Western Sahara
227.87 kilowatt-hours
in 2009
Mali rank
155th
Western Sahara rank
152nd
Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables over time
- Mali
- Western Sahara
How they compare
Western Sahara currently reports 227.87 kilowatt-hours against 196.09 kilowatt-hours in Mali, a difference of 31.78 kilowatt-hours.
That makes Western Sahara's figure about 1.2 times Mali's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Western Sahara has been ahead every year.
Mali ranks 155th and Western Sahara ranks 152nd of 208 countries.
Western Sahara has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables, Mali or Western Sahara?
- Western Sahara, at 227.87 kilowatt-hours against 196.09 kilowatt-hours in Mali as of 2009.
- What is the difference in per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables between Mali and Western Sahara?
- 31.78 kilowatt-hours, with Western Sahara ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Western Sahara?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2009.
- How do Mali and Western Sahara rank globally for per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables?
- Mali ranks 155th and Western Sahara ranks 152nd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in kilowatt-hours per person.