Nicaragua vs Western Sahara: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables
Nicaragua
245.8 kilowatt-hours
in 2024
Western Sahara
227.87 kilowatt-hours
in 2009
Nicaragua rank
150th
Western Sahara rank
152nd
Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables over time
- Nicaragua
- Western Sahara
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 245.8 kilowatt-hours against 227.87 kilowatt-hours in Western Sahara, a difference of 17.93 kilowatt-hours.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Western Sahara's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Nicaragua ranks 150th and Western Sahara ranks 152nd of 208 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables, Nicaragua or Western Sahara?
- Nicaragua, at 245.8 kilowatt-hours against 227.87 kilowatt-hours in Western Sahara as of 2024.
- What is the difference in per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables between Nicaragua and Western Sahara?
- 17.93 kilowatt-hours, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Western Sahara?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2009.
- How do Nicaragua and Western Sahara rank globally for per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables?
- Nicaragua ranks 150th and Western Sahara ranks 152nd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in kilowatt-hours per person.