Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables

Sri Lanka
284.98 kilowatt-hours
in 2025
Zimbabwe
264.51 kilowatt-hours
in 2024
Sri Lanka rank
146th
Zimbabwe rank
148th

Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Zimbabwe
100200300400500200020122025

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 284.98 kilowatt-hours against 264.51 kilowatt-hours in Zimbabwe, a difference of 20.47 kilowatt-hours.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 146th and Zimbabwe ranks 148th of 208 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 240.64 kilowatt-hours 275.53 kilowatt-hours 34.89 kilowatt-hours Zimbabwe
2010s 364.16 kilowatt-hours 274.59 kilowatt-hours 89.56 kilowatt-hours Sri Lanka
2020s 384.69 kilowatt-hours 210.44 kilowatt-hours 174.25 kilowatt-hours Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables, Sri Lanka or Zimbabwe?
Sri Lanka, at 284.98 kilowatt-hours against 264.51 kilowatt-hours in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?
20.47 kilowatt-hours, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe rank globally for per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables?
Sri Lanka ranks 146th and Zimbabwe ranks 148th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid, drawing on Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-electricity-fossil-nuclear-renewables/sri-lanka/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-electricity-fossil-nuclear-renewables/sri-lanka/zimbabwe/">Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe: Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables
Unit
kilowatt-hours
Source
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,940 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in kilowatt-hours per person.