Belarus vs Malaysia: Per capita fossil energy vs gdp
Belarus
28.93
in 2025
Malaysia
35.64
in 2025
Belarus rank
25th
Malaysia rank
22nd
Per capita fossil energy vs gdp over time
- Belarus
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 35.64 against 28.93 in Belarus, a difference of 6.71.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 25th and Malaysia ranks 22nd of 76 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Malaysia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 45.53 | 11.26 | 34.27 | Belarus |
| 1990s | 31.7 | 18.75 | 12.95 | Belarus |
| 2000s | 28.42 | 29.57 | 1.15 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 31.05 | 33.89 | 2.84 | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 30.33 | 34.62 | 4.29 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita fossil energy vs gdp, Belarus or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 35.64 against 28.93 in Belarus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in per capita fossil energy vs gdp between Belarus and Malaysia?
- 6.71, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Malaysia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Malaysia rank globally for per capita fossil energy vs gdp?
- Belarus ranks 25th and Malaysia ranks 22nd of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita fossil energy vs gdp. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.