Aruba vs South Sudan: Primary energy from nuclear per person
Aruba
0 kilowatt-hours per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0 kilowatt-hours per person
in 2025
Aruba rank
33rd
South Sudan rank
33rd
Primary energy from nuclear per person over time
- Aruba
- South Sudan
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 kilowatt-hours per person against 0 kilowatt-hours per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 kilowatt-hours per person.
Across all 13 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 33rd and South Sudan ranks 33rd of 214 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kilowatt-hours per person | 0 kilowatt-hours per person | 0 kilowatt-hours per person | β |
| 2020s | 0 kilowatt-hours per person | 0 kilowatt-hours per person | 0 kilowatt-hours per person | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear per person, Aruba or South Sudan?
- Aruba, at 0 kilowatt-hours per person against 0 kilowatt-hours per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear per person between Aruba and South Sudan?
- 0 kilowatt-hours per person, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and South Sudan rank globally for primary energy from nuclear per person?
- Aruba ranks 33rd and South Sudan ranks 33rd of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017); Population based on various sources (2024) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in kilowatt-hours of total energy supply per person.