Curaçao vs Zambia: Primary energy from nuclear per person
Curaçao
0 kilowatt-hours per person
in 2025
Zambia
0 kilowatt-hours per person
in 2025
Curaçao rank
33rd
Zambia rank
33rd
Primary energy from nuclear per person over time
- Curaçao
- Zambia
How they compare
Curaçao currently reports 0 kilowatt-hours per person against 0 kilowatt-hours per person in Zambia, a difference of 0 kilowatt-hours per person.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Curaçao ranks 33rd and Zambia ranks 33rd of 214 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curaçao | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kilowatt-hours per person | 0 kilowatt-hours per person | 0 kilowatt-hours per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 kilowatt-hours per person | 0 kilowatt-hours per person | 0 kilowatt-hours per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear per person, Curaçao or Zambia?
- Curaçao, at 0 kilowatt-hours per person against 0 kilowatt-hours per person in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear per person between Curaçao and Zambia?
- 0 kilowatt-hours per person, with Curaçao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Zambia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Curaçao and Zambia rank globally for primary energy from nuclear per person?
- Curaçao ranks 33rd and Zambia ranks 33rd of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in kilowatt-hours of total energy supply per person.