Congo vs Panama: Per capita renewable freshwater resources

Congo
36,785
in 2022
Panama
31,040
in 2022
Congo rank
16th
Panama rank
19th

Per capita renewable freshwater resources over time

  • Congo
  • Panama
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119912022

How they compare

Congo currently reports 36,785 against 31,040 in Panama, a difference of 5,745.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Panama's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 16th and Panama ranks 19th of 183 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 183,966 104,772 79,194 Congo
1970s 139,802 80,286 59,517 Congo
1980s 109,006 62,998 46,008 Congo
1990s 82,515 50,773 31,743 Congo
2000s 61,073 41,716 19,357 Congo
2010s 44,262 34,853 9,409 Congo
2020s 37,684 31,431 6,253 Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita renewable freshwater resources, Congo or Panama?
Congo, at 36,785 against 31,040 in Panama as of 2022.
What is the difference in per capita renewable freshwater resources between Congo and Panama?
5,745, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Panama?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Congo and Panama rank globally for per capita renewable freshwater resources?
Congo ranks 16th and Panama ranks 19th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Per capita renewable freshwater resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Per capita renewable freshwater resources
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
183 places, 10,438 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed