Rwanda vs South Africa: Renewable freshwater resources per person

Rwanda
695.92 cubic meters
in 2022
South Africa
718.2 cubic meters
in 2022
Rwanda rank
146th
South Africa rank
145th

Renewable freshwater resources per person over time

  • Rwanda
  • South Africa
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k3.0k196119912022

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 718.2 cubic meters against 695.92 cubic meters in Rwanda, a difference of 22.28 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 146th and South Africa ranks 145th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 6 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 2,766 cubic meters 2,353 cubic meters 412.95 cubic meters Rwanda
1970s 2,099 cubic meters 1,776 cubic meters 322.55 cubic meters Rwanda
1980s 1,537 cubic meters 1,310 cubic meters 226.87 cubic meters Rwanda
1990s 1,303 cubic meters 1,019 cubic meters 284.23 cubic meters Rwanda
2000s 1,060 cubic meters 909.33 cubic meters 150.32 cubic meters Rwanda
2010s 828.48 cubic meters 802.5 cubic meters 25.97 cubic meters Rwanda
2020s 711.45 cubic meters 728.78 cubic meters 17.34 cubic meters South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable freshwater resources per person, Rwanda or South Africa?
South Africa, at 718.2 cubic meters against 695.92 cubic meters in Rwanda as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable freshwater resources per person between Rwanda and South Africa?
22.28 cubic meters, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and South Africa?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Rwanda and South Africa rank globally for renewable freshwater resources per person?
Rwanda ranks 146th and South Africa ranks 145th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Renewable freshwater resources per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs South Africa: Renewable freshwater resources per person. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-renewable-freshwater-resources/rwanda/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-renewable-freshwater-resources/rwanda/south-africa/">Rwanda vs South Africa: Renewable freshwater resources per person</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable freshwater resources per person
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
183 places, 10,438 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources refers to the quantity of internal freshwater from inflowing river basins and recharging groundwater aquifers. This is measured in cubic meters per person per year.