How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and United Kingdom?

61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Primary energy from fossil nuclear renewables, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Japan vs United Kingdom: Primary energy from fossil nuclear renewables, per unit of GDP

Japan

0 units per US$ of GDP

in 2025

United Kingdom

0 units per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Japan rank

23rd

United Kingdom rank

22nd

Primary energy from fossil nuclear renewables, per unit of GDP over time

Japan
United Kingdom

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Japan, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes United Kingdom's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Japan ranks 23rd and United Kingdom ranks 22nd of 198 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Japan	United Kingdom	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	United Kingdom
1970s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	United Kingdom
1980s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	United Kingdom
1990s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	United Kingdom
2000s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	United Kingdom
2010s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	United Kingdom
2020s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary energy from fossil nuclear renewables, per unit of gdp, Japan or United Kingdom?: United Kingdom, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Japan as of 2025.
What is the difference in primary energy from fossil nuclear renewables, per unit of gdp between Japan and United Kingdom?: 0 units per US$ of GDP, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and United Kingdom?: 61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Japan and United Kingdom rank globally for primary energy from fossil nuclear renewables, per unit of gdp?: Japan ranks 23rd and United Kingdom ranks 22nd of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Primary energy from fossil nuclear renewables, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs United Kingdom: Primary energy from fossil nuclear renewables, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 October 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-from-fossil-nuclear-renewables-per-unit-of-gdp/japan/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-from-fossil-nuclear-renewables-per-unit-of-gdp/japan/united-kingdom/">Japan vs United Kingdom: Primary energy from fossil nuclear renewables, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Primary energy from fossil nuclear renewables, per unit of GDP
Unit: units per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 198 places, 9,138 data points, 1965–2025
Last refreshed: 27 October 2026

Primary energy from fossil nuclear renewables divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.