Azerbaijan vs Namibia: Primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables
Azerbaijan
0.0%
in 2025
Namibia
0.0%
in 2024
Azerbaijan rank
33rd
Namibia rank
33rd
Primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables over time
- Azerbaijan
- Namibia
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Namibia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 33rd and Namibia ranks 33rd of 212 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables, Azerbaijan or Namibia?
- Azerbaijan, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables between Azerbaijan and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Azerbaijan and Namibia rank globally for primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables?
- Azerbaijan ranks 33rd and Namibia ranks 33rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017); U.S. Energy Information Administration (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured as a percentage of total energy supply.