Belgium vs Kazakhstan: Primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate
Belgium
-24.1 % change on previous year
in 2025
Kazakhstan
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
Belgium rank
30th
Kazakhstan rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate over time
- Belgium
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Belgium currently reports -24.1 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Kazakhstan, a difference of 75.9 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 30th and Kazakhstan ranks 32nd of 35 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate, Belgium or Kazakhstan?
- Belgium, at -24.1 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Kazakhstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate between Belgium and Kazakhstan?
- 75.9 % change on previous year, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Kazakhstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium and Kazakhstan rank globally for primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate?
- Belgium ranks 30th and Kazakhstan ranks 32nd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Primary energy from nuclear. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.