South Africa vs United States of America: Primary energy from nuclear, per unit of GDP

South Africa
0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP
in 2025
United States of America
0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP
in 2025
South Africa rank
20th
United States of America rank
18th

Primary energy from nuclear, per unit of GDP over time

  • South Africa
  • United States of America
00000196519952025

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP against 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP in South Africa, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP.

That makes United States of America's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was United States of America ahead.

South Africa ranks 20th and United States of America ranks 18th of 201 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa United States of America Difference Ahead
1960s 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP United States of America
1970s 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP United States of America
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP United States of America
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP United States of America
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP United States of America
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP United States of America
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, per unit of gdp, South Africa or United States of America?
United States of America, at 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP against 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP in South Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear, per unit of gdp between South Africa and United States of America?
0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and United States of America?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do South Africa and United States of America rank globally for primary energy from nuclear, per unit of gdp?
South Africa ranks 20th and United States of America ranks 18th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary energy from nuclear, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs United States of America: Primary energy from nuclear, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-from-nuclear-per-unit-of-gdp/south-africa/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-from-nuclear-per-unit-of-gdp/south-africa/united-states/">South Africa vs United States of America: Primary energy from nuclear, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary energy from nuclear, per unit of GDP
Unit
terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 9,398 data points, 1965–2025
Last refreshed

Primary energy from nuclear divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.