Antarctica vs Cuba: Primary energy from nuclear
Antarctica
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Cuba
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Antarctica rank
32nd
Cuba rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Antarctica
- Cuba
How they compare
Antarctica currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Cuba, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Antarctica ranks 32nd and Cuba ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antarctica | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Antarctica or Cuba?
- Antarctica, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Antarctica and Cuba?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Antarctica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antarctica and Cuba?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Antarctica and Cuba rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Antarctica ranks 32nd and Cuba ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.