Antarctica vs Latvia: Primary energy from nuclear
Antarctica
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Latvia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Antarctica rank
33rd
Latvia rank
33rd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Antarctica
- Latvia
How they compare
Antarctica currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Latvia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 40 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Antarctica ranks 33rd and Latvia ranks 33rd of 215 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antarctica | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Antarctica or Latvia?
- Antarctica, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Antarctica and Latvia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Antarctica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antarctica and Latvia?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2024.
- How do Antarctica and Latvia rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Antarctica ranks 33rd and Latvia ranks 33rd of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.