Aruba vs Australia: Primary energy from nuclear
Aruba
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Australia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Aruba rank
32nd
Australia rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Aruba
- Australia
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Australia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 32nd and Australia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Australia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Aruba or Australia?
- Aruba, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Aruba and Australia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Australia?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Australia rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Aruba ranks 32nd and Australia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.