Aruba vs Macao: Primary energy from nuclear
Aruba
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Macao
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Aruba rank
32nd
Macao rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Aruba
- Macao
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Macao, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 32nd and Macao ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Aruba or Macao?
- Aruba, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Macao as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Aruba and Macao?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Macao?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Macao rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Aruba ranks 32nd and Macao ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.