Aruba vs Montenegro: Primary energy from nuclear
Aruba
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Montenegro
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Aruba rank
32nd
Montenegro rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Aruba
- Montenegro
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Montenegro, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 32nd and Montenegro ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Aruba or Montenegro?
- Aruba, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Aruba and Montenegro?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Montenegro?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Montenegro rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Aruba ranks 32nd and Montenegro ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.