Australia vs Madagascar: Primary energy from nuclear
Australia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Madagascar
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Australia rank
32nd
Madagascar rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Australia
- Madagascar
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Madagascar, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 32nd and Madagascar ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Australia or Madagascar?
- Australia, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Madagascar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Australia and Madagascar?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Madagascar?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Madagascar rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Australia ranks 32nd and Madagascar ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.