Barbados vs South Sudan: Primary energy from nuclear
Barbados
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
South Sudan
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Barbados rank
32nd
South Sudan rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Barbados
- South Sudan
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in South Sudan, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 13 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 32nd and South Sudan ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Barbados or South Sudan?
- Barbados, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Barbados and South Sudan?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and South Sudan rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Barbados ranks 32nd and South Sudan ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.