Bolivia vs Iceland: Primary energy from nuclear
Bolivia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Iceland
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Bolivia rank
32nd
Iceland rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Bolivia
- Iceland
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Iceland, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 56 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 32nd and Iceland ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Bolivia or Iceland?
- Bolivia, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Iceland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Bolivia and Iceland?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Iceland?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
- How do Bolivia and Iceland rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Bolivia ranks 32nd and Iceland ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.