Chile vs Tanzania: Primary energy from nuclear
Chile
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Tanzania
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Chile rank
32nd
Tanzania rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Chile
- Tanzania
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Tanzania, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 46 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 32nd and Tanzania ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Chile or Tanzania?
- Chile, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Tanzania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Chile and Tanzania?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tanzania?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Tanzania rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Chile ranks 32nd and Tanzania ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.