Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Primary energy from nuclear
Colombia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Colombia rank
32nd
Zimbabwe rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Colombia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Colombia or Zimbabwe?
- Colombia, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Colombia and Zimbabwe?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Zimbabwe?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2025.
- How do Colombia and Zimbabwe rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Colombia ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.