COK vs ECU: Primary energy from nuclear
COK
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
ECU
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
COK rank
32nd
ECU rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- COK
- ECU
How they compare
COK currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in ECU, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 45 years both countries report, ECU has been ahead every year.
COK ranks 32nd and ECU ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | COK | ECU | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, COK or ECU?
- COK, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in ECU as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between COK and ECU?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with COK ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for COK and ECU?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do COK and ECU rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- COK ranks 32nd and ECU ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.