Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Primary energy from nuclear
Costa Rica
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
33rd
Zimbabwe rank
33rd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Costa Rica
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 44 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 215 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Costa Rica or Zimbabwe?
- Costa Rica, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Zimbabwe rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Costa Rica ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.