Croatia vs Equatorial Guinea: Primary energy from nuclear
Croatia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Croatia rank
32nd
Equatorial Guinea rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Croatia
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 32nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Croatia or Equatorial Guinea?
- Croatia, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Croatia and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Equatorial Guinea?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Croatia ranks 32nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.