Cuba vs Kiribati: Primary energy from nuclear
Cuba
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Kiribati
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Cuba rank
32nd
Kiribati rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Cuba
- Kiribati
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Kiribati, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 32nd and Kiribati ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Cuba or Kiribati?
- Cuba, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Kiribati as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Cuba and Kiribati?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Kiribati?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Kiribati rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Cuba ranks 32nd and Kiribati ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.