Cuba vs North Macedonia: Primary energy from nuclear
Cuba
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
North Macedonia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Cuba rank
32nd
North Macedonia rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Cuba
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 31 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 32nd and North Macedonia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Cuba or North Macedonia?
- Cuba, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in North Macedonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Cuba and North Macedonia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and North Macedonia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Cuba and North Macedonia rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Cuba ranks 32nd and North Macedonia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.