Equatorial Guinea vs South Sudan: Primary energy from nuclear
Equatorial Guinea
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
South Sudan
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
32nd
South Sudan rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- South Sudan
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in South Sudan, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 14 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 32nd and South Sudan ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Equatorial Guinea or South Sudan?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Equatorial Guinea and South Sudan?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and South Sudan rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 32nd and South Sudan ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.