EST vs TUN: Primary energy from nuclear
EST
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
TUN
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
EST rank
32nd
TUN rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- EST
- TUN
How they compare
EST currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in TUN, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 41 years both countries report, TUN has been ahead every year.
EST ranks 32nd and TUN ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | EST | TUN | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, EST or TUN?
- EST, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in TUN as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between EST and TUN?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with EST ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for EST and TUN?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2025.
- How do EST and TUN rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- EST ranks 32nd and TUN ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.