Faroe Islands vs Singapore: Primary energy from nuclear
Faroe Islands
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Singapore
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Faroe Islands rank
33rd
Singapore rank
33rd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Faroe Islands
- Singapore
How they compare
Faroe Islands currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Singapore, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Faroe Islands ranks 33rd and Singapore ranks 33rd of 215 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Faroe Islands or Singapore?
- Faroe Islands, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Faroe Islands and Singapore?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Faroe Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Singapore?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Faroe Islands and Singapore rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Faroe Islands ranks 33rd and Singapore ranks 33rd of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.